Science is rooted in assimilatory colonialism, which emphasizes control over nature. During colonial expansion, these ideals were weaponized: scientific “progress” justified domination, extraction, and the erasure of Indigenous knowledge systems.
Today, we grow beyond science, with a clearer method not based on control or denial of the utmost truths. A way of knowing that’s not bound by reductionism, control, skepticism, politics of the funding shaping the results, but instead our most direct, our link with the Living Divine Whole that shapes our every thought, rather we see it yet or not. The religion that is science separates us from the supernatural permanently, permanently setting itself up for failure. The supernatural cannot be controlled, of which we try to do even in our spiritual practices, i.e. Witchcraft, Praying, etc.
Imagine a future epistemology. a field of knowledge that:
- the act of measuring itself imposes conditions that shape results. Like how I can play greater guitar riffs, when I don’t press record. ⏺
- Honors mystery, not as a failure of understanding, but as a sacred space where meaning lives.
- Moves beyond governing boundaries: true or false, natural or supernatural, observer or observed, etc.
- Centers ethics, interconnectedness & honors unpredictability, not just utility or prediction.
One great symbolic example how the measurer shapes the result:
If someone were to measure my Dick many variables can alter the results:
- Sexual attraction between me and the measurer. I’ve witnessed how sexual attraction follows trends. If I fit the niche being temporarily celebrated at the time, it could alter the results in my favor.
- The measurers intentions. If a preexisting bias exists, and the tone is incriminating, rather than stimulating, two vastly different measurements can occur.
- If I ejaculated recently, or preconditioned myself like an athlete prepping for a weigh in.
with repeatable signs, omens, etc. proven at https://MatthewEdwardHall.org/DivineProof, the utmost truths that we’ve had in sight all along, are provable and findable in a human sense, and it’s parent linguistic sense. Whoever can understand language: can understand symbols: can understand this as language from something beyond. However, the flaw of science is that it will forever deny such findings as this flips the foundation of science.
Meaning, truth, and connection to the Divine is embedded not in just equations, but in the language of life itself.
Meaning is not just found in data, but in destiny. Where the Divine speaks through coincidence, pattern, and symbol. And where truth is not just what can be tested, but what can be felt.
This also overcomes the boundaries of Jungian psychology as the idea “synchronicity” is acausal in its links and nothing is without a linked cause. Nothing is random.
Here’s one that cannot be rationally denied:
Exit 414, San Mateo 92:
- October 14, ’92 → birthday
- San Mateo → Spanish for Matthew
- Route 92 → Matching the birth year
- Exit 414 → Matching the birth day 14
This is one out of hundreds. It’s written in history, it’s written in the distance of the stars, it’s written in our everyday actions.
A symbolic resonance that transcends conventional frameworks. A language of reality that speaks through patterns, names, numbers, and moments. It’s not just synchronicity in the Jungian sense, but something more deliberate, more authored. If synchronicity is a whisper, this feels like a declaration.
This challenges the idea of acausality by asserting that these symbolic alignments aren’t random or only meaningful to the observer. They’re caused, placed, intended. That overcomes the boundaries of the Jung’s model. Instead of “meaningful coincidence,” it becomes “meaningful correspondence. ”A system of signs embedded in the fabric of reality.
To a skeptic, this might seem like cherry picking. But these aren’t isolated. They’re part of a network of signs. Repeating, reinforcing, undeniable when seen in totality.
This challenges science’s foundation because it suggests:
- The universe is not indifferent, it’s communicative.
- Meaning is not emergent, it’s embedded.
- Truth is not just empirical, it’s symbolic.